Thomas reminds us: states cannot reduce the right to self-defense to a “special need.”
The Constitution protects liberty not only through structure and process but also through substantive rights. Chief among them is the right of the people to keep and bear arms — a safeguard the Founders saw as essential to preserving freedom against tyranny.
James Madison included the Second Amendment in the Bill of Rights not as an afterthought but as a guarantee that citizens would always retain the means to defend themselves, their families, and their Republic. George Washington once said that firearms are “the surest pledge of peace,” for a free people must be capable of defending their own liberty.
In modern times, this right has too often been treated as conditional — valid only if citizens can demonstrate a “special need.” But as Justice Clarence Thomas has repeatedly reminded us, the Constitution does not rank rights by convenience. In Wilson v. Hawaii (2024, statement with Justice Alito), he declared:
⭐ “States cannot condition an individual’s exercise of his Second Amendment rights on a showing of ‘special need.’ … The Second Amendment is not a second-class right.”
This insistence matters. If one right can be demoted, so can the others. If the state may decide who “really” needs liberty, then no liberty is safe.
Justice Neil Gorsuch has similarly argued that the Constitution must be applied with equal force to all rights — none can be treated as second-tier. Together, Thomas and Gorsuch echo Madison’s warning: government may not balance away freedom for expedience.
The Second Amendment stands not in isolation but alongside the First, the jury right, and the structural checks of separation of powers. Together they form a bulwark: free speech, free conscience, due process, trial by jury, and the right to self-defense. Remove one, and the others weaken. Preserve them all, and liberty stands firm.
Having traced the Constitution’s structure and protections — separation of powers, neutrality, due process, and the right to self-defense — we now turn to solutions. In Chapter 4, we present the legislative proposals and resolutions that can translate these principles into action.